McNeil

McNeil v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20213:21-cv-00860California3,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONTE BAY McNEIL, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00860-JAH-AHG

CDCR #AY5635,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. 1) GRANTING RENEWED MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUERIS

WARREN L. MONTGOMERY,

[ECF No. 5];

ROBERT MARTINEZ, FRANCISCO

PARTIDA, KATHLEEN ALLISON, 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) 18 On May 3, 2021, Donte Bay McNeil (“McNeil” or “Plaintiff”), a state inmate currently incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison (“CSP”) located in Calipatria, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 3. On June 1, 2021, the Court denied McNeil’s IFP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.