Manfredi

Manfredi v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20213:21-cv-00883California1,958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Michael MANFREDI, Case No.: 21-cv-00883-BAS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF

EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS

CONFERENCE AND CASE

INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 14 [ECF NO. 21] 15 The parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the September 3, 2021 Early Neutral 16 Evaluation and Case Management Conference is currently before the Court. (ECF No. 21.) 17 The parties jointly request that the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case 18 Management Conference (“ENE/CMC”) be continued because Trans Union’s counsel is 19 unavailable on September 3, 2021, due to a scheduling conflict that arose this past week. 20 (Id. at 2.) The Joint Motion indicated that “Counsel for Trans Union has conferred with 21 counsel for all Parties, who do not oppose this request” and that “[n]o parties will be 22 prejudiced” due to the continuance of the ENE. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.