Scott
Scott v. Yoo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLIE D. SCOTT, Case No.: 21-cv-1319-MMA (KSC)
CDCR #AY-8804
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff,
AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT
14 vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
[Doc. No. 2] 16 FRANK YOO, M.D. et al.,
GRANTING MOTION FOR
Defendants. EXTENSION OF TIME 18 [Doc. No. 3]
20 Billie D. Scott (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate currently incarcerated California Health Care Facility, located in Stockton, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for extension of time. See Doc. No. 3. 28 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS …