Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON CLEVELAND, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-02141-JM (JLB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’/COUNTER-

LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

RESEARCH LTD, et al., COMPEL Defendants. 16 [ECF No. 58]

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

18 19 20 Before the Court is a motion to compel filed by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Don Cleveland, Arshad Desai, Frank Furnari, Richard Kolodner, Paul Mischel, Karen Oegema, and Bing Ren (collectively “Plaintiffs”). (ECF No. 58.) Defendants/Counter-Claimants Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd. (“Ludwig”), Chi Van Dang (“Dang”), Edward A. McDermott, Jr. (“McDermott”), and John L. Notter (collectively “Defendants”) oppose. (ECF No. 62.) Plaintiffs were given leave to file a reply, which they did. (ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion…