Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE ESCAMILLA AVINA, on Case No. 20-cv-00166-BAS-MDD behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED ATTORNEY SERVICES Plaintiff, INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC; CREDIT (ECF No. 44)

CORP. SOLUTIONS, INC.; THOMAS

FLYNN,

16 Defendants. 17 Defendant Specialized Attorney Services, Inc. (“SPS”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”) on June 11, 2021, noticing a hearing date of August 9, 2021. (ECF No. 44.) Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opposition was July 26, 2021. See Civ. LR 7.1(e). No opposition was filed on the docket and SPS informed the Court that it never received service of Plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 47.) Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) provides that a party opposing a motion must file either an opposition or a…