Saul

Lee Taylor v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:20-cv-00985California6,496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES T., No. 3:20-cv-00985-JM-LL

Plaintiff, REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

v. CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF Nos. 17, 20] Defendant. 18 Plaintiff James T. brought this action for judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his claim for disability insurance benefits. Before this Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17 (“Pl.’s Mot.”)], Defendant’s Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20 (“Def.’s Mot.”)], and Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 21 (“Pl.’s Reply”)]. This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Jeffrey T. Miller pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(c) of the United 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.