Davall

Davall v. Cordero

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20213:20-cv-01968California1,442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DAVALL, CDCR #AW-8294, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. FOR ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

A. CORDERO; D. WHITE; WHITMAN,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT

Defendants. PREJUDICE

[Doc. No. 35] 17 Plaintiff Joseph Davall (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution by denying his request to be housed in a single cell. See generally Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is plaintiff Joseph Davall’s (“plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 35. Defendant Whitman1 (“defendant” or “Whitman”) opposes the Motion (“Opposition” or “Opp.”, Doc. No. 47), and plaintiff filed a reply (“Reply”). Doc. No. 51. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.