Mourning

Mourning v. Batemen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:21-cv-01396California2,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY L. MOURNING, Case No. 21-cv-01396-BAS-LL 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED

MILDRED S. BATEMAN; JOHN IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BROWN (BEING FICTITIOUS NAME), (ECF No. 2); (2) DISMISSING AS MOOT Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF No. 3); AND 17 (3) DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

19 Before the Court is Plaintiff Jeffery Mourning’s Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and Motion to Appoint Counsel. (ECF Nos. 1–3.) For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Motion”), DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the action. I. IFP MOTION Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a litigant who is unable to pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.