Diaz
Diaz v. Madden
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20213:20-cv-02147California4,577 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONIVAN DIAZ, Case No.: 20cv2147-GPC (BGS)
CDCR #AU-5079,
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, 1915A(b)(1)
R. BUMGART, Litigation Coordinator,
N. TELLES, Litigation Coordinator, and
D. LOOP, Correctional Lieutenant,
18 Defendants. 19 20 On November 2, 2020, Plaintiff Donivan Diaz, a state prisoner incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“Centinela”) in Imperial, California, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff claimed that four Centinela officials, a Correctional Lieutenant, two Litigation Coordinators and the Warden, violated his federal constitutional rights to due process, access to the courts, and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment when they confiscated computer disks containing his criminal case file…