Nguyen

Nguyen v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20213:18-cv-00590California2,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CU NGUYEN, Case No.: 18-cv-00590-H-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [Doc. No. 37.] Commissioner of Social Security 15 Administration, Defendant. 17 On June 8, 2021, Plaintiff Cu Nguyen filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.6. (Doc. No. 37.) On July 22, 2021, Defendant filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees. (Doc. No. 42.) On August 2, 2021, the Court took the matter under submission. (Doc. No. 43.) On August 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. No. 46.) For the reasons below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees. Background On August 29, 2013, Plaintiff applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.