Newsom

Williams v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20213:20-cv-02398California2,641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY WILLIAMS Case No.: 20-CV-2398-GPC-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

GAVIN NEWSOM; KATHLEEN

ALLISON; MARCUS POLLARD; DR.

[ECF No. 12]

BLASDELLS,

16 Defendants.

18 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint on the 19 grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a claim against Defendants because Plaintiff failed to 20 exhaust administrative remedies. ECF No. 12. On May 12, 2021, the Court granted 21 Plaintiff’s request for extension of time to file an opposition no later than July 12, 2021. 22 ECF No. 15. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. The Court finds that the 23 matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 24 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to 25 dismiss.

27 Procedural Background On December…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.