Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-00812-GPC-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION APPLE INC.,

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND

Defendant. (2) ENTERING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

17 [ECF No. 36] 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Protective Order. (ECF No. 36.) In their Joint Motion, the parties provide that they have stipulated to a Protective Order, except for Paragraph 9(b)(ii), which contemplates whether in-house counsel may access materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (“C-AEO”). (Id. at 2.) The parties request that the Court “select between the parties’ competing proposals.” (Id.) The Court declines to enter a Stipulated Protective Order that includes a contested provision, as it would not be “stipulated,” and will rule on the parties’ dispute concerning in-house counsels’ access to C-AEO materials under separate order. /// /// Good cause appearing as to…