Pickett

Bradford v. Pickett

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:20-cv-00449California1,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0449-AJB-MSB

CDCR #H-16258

ORDER DISMISSING

PLAINTIFF’S “OBJECTIONS” Plaintiff,

AND DENYING MOTION TO

14 vs. COMPEL

E. PICKETT, et al.,

[ECF No. 17] Defendants. 17 18 Raymond Alford Bradford, (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a “Objections” to this Court’s July 27, 2021 Order denying his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal. ECF No. 17. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging Defendants used excessive force against him, in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. See Compl., ECF No. 1. On March 23, 2020, the Court dismissed the action without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the civil filing and administrative fee and/or failed to submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Order, 28 ECF No. 2. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.