Amezquita

Amezquita v. Hough

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:19-cv-01461California3,595 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE G. AMEZQUITA Case No.: 3:19-cv-01461-AJB-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D.

JUDGE’S REPORT AND

HOUGH, et al., RECOMMENDATION; and Defendants. 16 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

(Doc. No. 48, 56)

21 Before the Court is Correctional Officers Armenta, Hough, and Downs’ 22 (“Defendants”) motion for summary judgment on pro se prisoner Jose G. Amezquita’s 23 (“Plaintiff”) claims against them, pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983, 24 for deliberate indifference to a serious risk of harm in violation of the Eight Amendment. 25 (Doc. No. 47). The Court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge Karen S. 26 Crawford for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). The R&R advises the Court to grant 27 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, as well as deny Plaintiff’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.