Thistle

Thistle v. La Rose

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20213:21-cv-01414California1,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID JOHN THISTLE, Case No.: 21-CV-1414 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; AND (2) DISMISSING

FRANK LA ROSE,

COMPLAINT WITHOUT

Defendant. PREJUDICE

15 (ECF No. 2)

17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David John Thistle’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, alleges that the Ohio Secretary of State’s candidacy forms and documents related to the 11th Congressional District Special Election are unconstitutional. See generally “Compl.,” ECF No. 1. Having considered carefully Plaintiff’s Complaint, IFP Motion, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.