Simmons

Simmons v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20213:20-cv-01068California2,608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROLAND S., Case No.: 3:20-cv-01068-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND

PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

AND EXPENSES

Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 25] 16 17 18

21 22 23

26 27 28 Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920.1 ECF No. 25. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the parties’ joint motion. I. BACKGROUND The underlying action involves Plaintiff’s appeal of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for supplemental security income at the agency level. ECF No. 1. After the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) filed the administrative record in lieu of an answer, the Court issued a scheduling order. ECF No. 20. Among other requirements in the scheduling order, the Court directed the parties to engage in formal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.