Phillips

Phillips v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20213:21-cv-00987California4,162 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SUSAN PHILLIPS, EKATERINI Case No.: 21-cv-987-WQH-KSC

CAMPOS, ROBERT JELLINEK,

14 and JANINE HARRISON, ORDER Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.

19 d/b/a Hoover, 20 Defendant. 21 HAYES, Judge: 22 The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss Class Action Complaint and 23 Motion for a More Definite Statement filed by Defendant Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. (ECF 24 No. 5) and the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiffs Susan Phillips, Ekaterini Campos, 25 Robert Jellinek, and Janine Harrison (ECF No. 8). 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND On April 6, 2021, Plaintiffs Susan Phillips, Ekaterini Campos, Robert Jellinek, and Janine Harrison filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendant Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. d/b/a Hoover (“Royal Appliance”) in the San Diego County Superior Court. (Compl., Ex. A to Notice of Removal (“NOR”), ECF No. 1-2 at 4). Plaintiffs bring consumer claims against Defendant Royal Appliance under …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.