Victorino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS VICTORINO and ADAM Case No.: 16cv1617-GPC(JLB) TAVITIAN, individually, and on behalf of 12 other members of the general public ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S similarly situated, MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS

Plaintiffs, [Dkt. No. 370.] v. FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 Defendant.

19 Before the Court is Defendant’s second motion to decertify class. (Dkt. No. 370.) 20 Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendant replied. (Dkt. Nos. 374, 376.) The Court 21 finds that the matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local 22 Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion 23 to decertify. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 Background Plaintiff Carlos Victorino1 (“Victorino” or “Plaintiff”) filed the operative putative first amended class action complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA” or “Defendant”) based on defects in the 2013-2015 Dodge Dart…