Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CENTENO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-2098-L-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO

MAGISTRATE ORDER [ECF 135]

CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al. Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court in this civil rights action is Plaintiff’s objection to 17 Magistrate Judge Butcher’s order that denied Plaintiff’s request for sanctions. Defendants 18 opposed. The Court decides the matter without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1. 19 Magistrate Judge Butcher issued the order on May 18, 2021. (ECF 130). Plaintiff 20 filed his objection on June 7, 2021, after the deadline under Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 72. (See ECF 135). The Court therefore overrules the objection. See Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 72(a); see, e.g., Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 23 1996) (“a party who fails to file timely objections to a magistrate judge’s non-dispositive 24 order with the district judge to whom the case is assigned forfeits its…