Dunford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK DUNFORD, Case No.: 3:21-cv-1382-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING

v. CASE TO STATE COURT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; DOES 1-10, Defendants. 16 17 The original complaint in this action, filed in state court, asserted one claim under federal law for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), along with a claim for violation of California’s Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act (“CCRAA”). [Doc. No. 1-2.] Defendant Bank of America, N.A. removed the action to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) based on the existence of a federal question (the FCRA claim) and supplemental jurisdiction over the state claim. [Doc. No. 1.] On August 30, 2021, Plaintiff amended his complaint. [Doc. No. 5.] Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) drops the FCRA claim and instead asserts only one state law claim for violation of the CCRAA. [Id.] The FAC…