Singleton
Singleton v. SDG&E
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20213:21-cv-01594California927 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RAYMONDA SINGLETON, Case No.: 21-cv-1594-CAB-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS
FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILING
SDG&E, et al.,
TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT
Defendants. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii);
AND
14 2) DENYING MOTIONS TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND TO APPOINT COUNSEL AS MOOT [Doc. Nos. 2, 3]
19 Plaintiff Raymonda Singleton filed this civil action against a host of defendants, 20 including San Diego Gas & Electric (“SDG&E”), Cox Internet, Housing Urban and 21 Development, and Kaiser Hospital, among others. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay 22 the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, she has 23 filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 24 [Doc. No. 2], together with a Motion to Appoint Counsel. [Doc. No. 3.]