Singleton

Singleton v. SDG&E

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20213:21-cv-01594California927 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RAYMONDA SINGLETON, Case No.: 21-cv-1594-CAB-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION AS

FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILING

SDG&E, et al.,

TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT

Defendants. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii);

AND

14 2) DENYING MOTIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND TO APPOINT COUNSEL AS MOOT [Doc. Nos. 2, 3]

19 Plaintiff Raymonda Singleton filed this civil action against a host of defendants, 20 including San Diego Gas & Electric (“SDG&E”), Cox Internet, Housing Urban and 21 Development, and Kaiser Hospital, among others. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiff did not prepay 22 the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, she has 23 filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 24 [Doc. No. 2], together with a Motion to Appoint Counsel. [Doc. No. 3.]

I. Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.