Bracamonte

Bradford v. Bracamonte

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20213:20-cv-00213California6,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case Nos.: 20cv0213-WQH (WVG) CDCR #H-16258, 20cv2482-WQH (AHG)

Plaintiff, 13 vs.

ORDER DISMISSING

P. BRACAMONTE, et al.,

CONSOLIDATED SECOND Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO

__________________________________ U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b)

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD,

CDCR #H-16258,

19 Plaintiff, 20 vs.

T. LEMON, et al.,

22 Defendants.

24 Raymond Alford Bradford (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility in Stockton, California, proceeding pro se, has filed two related actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Bradford v. Bracamonte, 20cv0213- WQH (WVG) (S.D. Cal.); Bradford v. Lemon, 20cv2482-WQH (AHG) (S.D. Cal.).) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the first of these two cases, Bracamonte. (See Bracamonte, 20cv0213-WQH (WVG)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.