Hall
Hall v. Marriott International, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TODD HALL, individually and on behalf Case No.: 3:19-cv-01715-JLS-AHG of all others similarly situated, et al., ORDER: Plaintiffs, 14 (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO v. AMEND THE SCHEDULING MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ORDER, and
Defendant. (2) ISSUING THIRD AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
[ECF No. 109]
20 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 21 109. The parties seek an order from the Court extending case management deadlines by 22 approximately 45 days. Id. 23 Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good 24 25 cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with 26 the judge’s consent”); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”); ECF No. 99 at 3 (“[t]he 27 dates set forth…