E.A.R.R

E.A.R.R v. U.S. Department Of Homeland Security (DHS)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20213:20-cv-02146California307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E.A.R.R., et al., Case No.: 20-CV-2146 TWR (BGS)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR A STAY

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY (“DHS”), et al., (ECF No. 72) Defendants. 16 Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion for a Stay. (ECF No. 72.) “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). In determining whether to issue a stay, the court considers the “possible damage which may result from the granting of a stay, the hardship or inequity which a party may suffer in being required to go forward, and the orderly course of justice measured in terms of the simplifying or complicating of issues, proof, and questions of law which could be expected to result from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.