Gavilanes-Curiel
Gavilanes-Curiel v. Archambeault
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
DISCUSSION
25 Petitioner seeks release from ICE custody for violation of his Fifth Amendment 26 rights. He alleges that the Imperial Regional Detention Facility (IRDF) is placing him at 27 extraordinary and unreasonable risk of contracting COVID-19 and that he is medically 28 vulnerable due to his obesity. He has not been released pending his removal proceedings because he has been deemed to pose a threat to public safety due to his criminal history, which includes an aggravated felony. [Doc. No. 5-1 at 2, 6-12, 15-17, 27-28, 30, 32-33.] To succeed on a habeas petition, a petitioner must show that he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Due process imposes a duty on the government “to assume some responsibility for [the] safety and general well-being” of persons it takes into its custody. DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 489 U.S. 189, 199-200 (1989) (citation omitted). The government can consequently be held liable for a due process violation where a government official affirmatively places individuals, with deliberate indifference to their health…