Amelina

Amelina v. Selene Finance LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20213:21-cv-00512California2,904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VICTORIA A. AMELINA and Case No.: 21-cv-00512-CAB-LL MICHAEL S. SAPELKIN, husband and 9 wife, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED Plaintiffs,

COMPLAINT

11 v. 12 SELENE FINANCE LP, a Delaware [Doc. No. 23] Limited Partnership Company; JOE DAVILA; and HILARY JACKSON , 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court Defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”). The deadline for Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion has passed without any filing from Plaintiffs. The lack of opposition permits the Court to grant the motion a dismiss the FAC without prejudice on that basis alone. For the following reasons, however, the motion is granted on its merits, and the FAC is dismissed with prejudice. I. Background On March 23, 2021, Plaintiffs filed the original complaint against Defendants (1) Selene Finance LP (“Selene”), (2) Selene’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Joe Davila, and (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.