Gallegos

Gallegos v. Seeley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20213:18-cv-01322California6,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO GALLEGOS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01322-JAH-MSB

CDCR #T-63165,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, SEELEY’S MOTION FOR vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PURSUANT TO

K. SEELEY, M..D.,

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 58] 17 18 Currently before the Court is Defendant K. Seeley’s (“Seeley”) second Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (ECF No. 58). Alejandro Gallegos (“Gallegos”) has filed an Opposition to this Motion to which Seeley has filed a Reply (ECF Nos. 60, 61). While the Motion was initially calendared before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg, the Court has determined that this Motion is suitable for disposition upon the papers without oral argument and that no Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Berg is necessary. / / / / / / For the reasons explained, the Court DENIES Seeley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.