Horton

Horton v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20213:21-cv-00400California2,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 MICHELLE HORTON, Case No.: 21-cv-00400-H-BGS 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

13 v. CITY OF LA MESA’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; EVAN

SOBZCAK; JACOB MACLEOD; [Doc. No. 21.]

UNKNOWN SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL; CITY OF

LA MESA; and UNKNOWN LA MESA

POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL,

18 Defendants.

On August 27, 2021, Defendant City of La Mesa filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (Doc. No. 21.) On September 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to La Mesa’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. No. 23.) On September 16, 2021, the La Mesa filed its reply. (Doc. No. 25.) The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), determines the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, submits the motion on the parties’ papers, and vacates the hearing. For the reasons below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.