Baize
Baize v. United States District Court, Southern District of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBBIE BAIZE, Case No. 21-cv-01262-BAS-KSC 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendant. 16 In response to the Court’s order dismissing the Complaint dated August 3, 2021 (ECF No. 10), Plaintiff has filed two documents regarding her claims in this case. (ECF Nos. 14, 16.) The Court construes both documents as Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The Court also construes one of these documents (ECF No. 14) as a motion to appoint counsel, compounding upon an earlier, pending motion to appoint counsel, which Plaintiff filed on July 14, 2021 (ECF Nos. 3). For the reasons stated below, the Court (1) DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action (ECF Nos. 14, 16) and (2) TERMINATES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel (ECF Nos. 3, 14).
26 27 28 I. LEGAL STANDARD A. Section 1915(e) Pre-Answer Screening Because Plaintiff…