Gellman

Gellman v. Hunsinger

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20213:18-cv-02641California4,726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER GELLMAN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-2641-BAS-AGS

Petitioners,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PETITIONERS’ ANDREA HUNSINGER, et al.,

MOTION TO CONFIRM

Respondents. ARBITRATION AWARD (ECF No. 22); AND

(2) DENYING RESPONDENTS’

MOTION TO VACATE

ARBITRATION AWARD

(ECF No. 23).

21 22 Peter Gellman and Palmerston LLC (together, Petitioners) and Andrea Hunsinger and Advanced Wealth Plan (together, Respondents) are financial advisors in the business of selling life insurance policies. The parties entered an arbitration following a dispute on dividing the commissions from the sales of certain life insurance policies. The Arbitrator entered an award in favor of Petitioners on all claims, finding that Respondents owe 28 Petitioners compensatory damages, emotional distress damages, and punitive damages, in addition to legal fees incurred by Petitioners to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.