Matheis

Matheis v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20213:20-cv-02100California2,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN THOMAS MATHEIS, Case No.: 3:20-cv-2100-GPC-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION C. GODINEZ, et al.,

TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY

Defendants. DEADLINES;

(2) DEFERRING MOTION FOR INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS; and

(3) REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL

MOTION FOR INDEPENDENT

MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS WITH

SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY

22 RULE 35(a)(2)(B) 23 [ECF Nos. 49, 50]

25 26 27 28 Before the Court are: (1) Defendants’ Ex Parte Application to Continue the Fact Discovery Deadline for Independent Medical Examinations and Expert Report Exchange Deadline Under Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) (ECF No. 49); and (2) the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Participate in Independent Medical Examinations with Psychiatrist Dominick Addario, M.D. and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.