Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20213:18-cv-01581California886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 18cv1581-TWR(KSC)

CDCR #AG-2394,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, EX PARTE MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION AND RE-

SETTING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE

O. NAVARRO; E. ESTRADA; J. MEJIA;

FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANTS’ and A. SILVA,

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

16 Defendants. JUDGMENT 17 [Doc. No. 125.] 18 Before the Court is plaintiff’s recently filed Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration that was docketed as an Opposition to defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [Doc. No. 125.] In his Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. No. 125], plaintiff requests that the Court set aside its Order of August 9, 2021 [Doc. No. 122]. The Court’s Order of August 9, 2021 [Doc. No. 122], denied plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Extension of the Summary Judgment Deadline pursuant to Federal Rule 56(d) [Doc. No. 118]. Pursuant to Federal Rule 56(d), plaintiff requested additional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.