Dorado

Dorado v. Crumb

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20213:20-cv-01936California3,465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL

CDCR #BN 7728,

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT v. 14 (ECF No. 23)

CATHERINE CRUMB; JOHN

SULLIVAN; JESSICA COTTO; CITY

OF SAN DIEGO; COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO; SAN DIEGO SHERIFF,

Defendants. 19 20 Daniel Dorado (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11) for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A(b) and granted leave to amend. (See ECF No. 11, at 9-10.) After being granted an extension of time, Plaintiff timely filed a Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23, SAC.) / / / / / / I. Screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A A. Standard of Review The Court must conduct an initial review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.