Fahr
Fahr v. City of San Diego, California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES FAHR, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1676-BAS-BGS
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
PARTE MOTION FOR
Defendants. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 2); AND
17 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME (ECF No. 5)
20 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ ex parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order or, Alternatively, Preliminary Injunction (“Motion for a TRO”) and ex parte application for an order shortening the time for this Court to hear that Motion (“Motion to Shorten”), both of which Plaintiffs filed on September 24, 2021. (Mot. for TRO, ECF No. 2; Mot. to Shorten, ECF No. 5.) The Court finds those Motions suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES both…