(HC)Royal

(HC)Royal v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20213:21-cv-00834California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLIN ROYAL, Case No.: 21-CV-834-WQH(WVG)

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND AND REOPENING CASE

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, [Doc. No. 16.] Respondent. 16 On August 16, 2019, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case was transferred to this Court on April 29, 2021 and was assigned case no. 21-CV-834-WQH(WVG). (See Royal v. Madden, 21-CV- 834-WQH(WVG) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 1).) In case no. 21-CV-834- WQH(WVG), Royal challenges his conviction in San Diego Superior Court case no SCE361596. (Id.) The Court informed Royal in an Order dated May 13, 2021, that he had filed a mixed petition and provided Royal with four options to choose from in order to proceed with his case. (See Order dated May 13, 2021 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.