Dare

Dare v. Nam

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20213:19-cv-01765-JAH-MSBCalifornia3,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 6] INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN

FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP;

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,

D/B/A MR. COOPER, Defendants. 18 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, d.b.a. Mr. Cooper’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the doctrine of res judicata. See Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff filed a response to the motion [Doc. No. 16] and 24

26 1 Defendant titles its memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to dismiss as being brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) but sets forth the legal standard for a motion to dismiss brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.