Dare
Dare v. Nam
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 6] INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN
FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP;
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,
D/B/A MR. COOPER, Defendants. 18 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, d.b.a. Mr. Cooper’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the doctrine of res judicata. See Doc. No. 6. Plaintiff filed a response to the motion [Doc. No. 16] and 24
26 1 Defendant titles its memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to dismiss as being brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) but sets forth the legal standard for a motion to dismiss brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). …