Nieratko

Nieratko v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20213:21-cv-01112California2,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD EGAN NIERATKO and WINDY Case No. 21-cv-01112-BAS-BGS

RENEE NIERATKO,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, REMAND (ECF No. 9) v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs Chad Nieratko and Windy Nieratko bring a Motion to Remand this action to state court. (ECF No. 9.) On June 14, 2021, Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) removed this matter to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs contest removal arguing Ford did not adequately prove diversity of citizenship and the minimum amount in controversy to satisfy diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 is not met. (Mot. to Remand, at 1:5–8.) The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Court finds removal was appropriate and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND On May 13, 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.