Klaas

Klaas v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20213:20-cv-01463California4,067 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMY CATHERINE K., Case No.: 20cv1463-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 14] AND KILOLO KIJAKAZII, Acting

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-

Commissioner of Social Security, MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendant. JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 18.]

17 On July 29, 2020, plaintiff Amy Catherine K. commenced an action pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g), against Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner. [Doc. No. 1.] Currently before the Court are plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment seeking a reversal with an award of benefits or a remand for further proceedings [Doc. No. 14]; defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment seeking an order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of benefits [Doc. No. 18]; and plaintiff’s Reply [Doc. No. 19]. For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.