Carter

EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:20-cv-01058California3,617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EPICENTRX, INC., Case No: 3:20-cv-01058-LAB-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISQUALIFY ATTORNEYS [DKT. 40] AND GRANTING COREY A. CARTER,

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

Defendant. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL

SUBMISSION [DKT. 55]

16 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant EpicentRx, Inc. (“EpicentRx”) filed suit against Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Dr. Corey A. Carter (“Dr. Carter”) for claims related to his alleged misconduct while employed as the CEO of EpicentRx. Dr. Carter retained attorneys Guy A. Ricciardulli and Donald R. McKillop and their respective law firms (“Defense Counsel”) to defend him in this matter. EpicentRx then filed this Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel (“Motion”), contending that Counsel’s previous representation of EpicentRx disqualifies them from serving as opposing counsel here. The parties dispute whether the two legal matters were substantially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.