Dare

Dare v. Nam

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20213:19-cv-01765-JAH-MSBCalifornia5,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN [Doc. No. 3]

FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP;

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,

D/B/A MR. COOPER, Defendants. 18 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP and Inku Nam’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). See Doc. No. 3. Plaintiff filed a response to the motion. See Doc. No. 14. After a careful review of the pleadings and relevant exhibits, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. /// /// FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.