Dare
Dare v. Nam
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20213:19-cv-01765-JAH-MSBCalifornia5,493 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DARE, Case No.: 19cv1765-JAH (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
INKU NAM; BARRETT DAFFIN [Doc. No. 3]
FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP;
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,
D/B/A MR. COOPER, Defendants. 18 INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP and Inku Nam’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Michael Dare’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or in the alternative motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). See Doc. No. 3. Plaintiff filed a response to the motion. See Doc. No. 14. After a careful review of the pleadings and relevant exhibits, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. /// /// FACTUAL…