Thurston

Thurston v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:21-cv-01578California3,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDERSON P. THURSTON, Case No. 21-CV-01578-BAS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO MARCUS POLLARD, et al.,

PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendants. PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2);

16 (2) DISMISSING FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS

CLAIM FOR FAILURE TO

18 STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 1); AND

20 (3) DIRECTING USMS TO SERVE DEFENDANTS WITH

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Anderson P. Thurston, currently incarcerated at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“CSATF”), seeks by this action damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See generally ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff proceeds pro se. He did not prepay the $402.00 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) at the time of filing and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.