Raiser
Raiser v. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 20-CV-1490 TWR (AGS)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
ORDER OR PRELIMINARY DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
INJUNCTION
16 Defendants. (ECF No. 52)
18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aaron Riser’s “Emergency” Ex Parte Application for Order (“Ex Parte App.,” ECF No. 52). “In our adversary system, ex parte motions are disfavored.” Ayestas v. Davis, 584 U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 1080, 1091 (2018); accord United States v. Thompson, 827 F.2d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir. 1987)). Consequently, “opportunities for legitimate ex parte applications are extremely limited.” Maxson v. Mosaic Sales Sols. U.S. Operating Co., LLC, No. 2:14-CV-02116-APG, 2015 WL 4661981, at *1 (D. Nev. July 29,…