Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:18-cv-00744California5,304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS. INC., Case No.: 18-cv-0744 W (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND THE CLOROX COMPANY, et al.,

DENYING IN PART THE CLOROX

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 117];

AND

15 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

AVICENNA NUTRACEUTICAL’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 120.]

20 Pending before this Court are Defendants The Clorox Company, Nutranext, and Neocell Holding Company’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 117] and Defendant Avicenna Nutraceutical LLC’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 120]. The Court decides the matters without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART both motions [Docs. 117, 120]. Further, good cause showing, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.