Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:18-cv-00744California5,304 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS. INC., Case No.: 18-cv-0744 W (KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND THE CLOROX COMPANY, et al.,
DENYING IN PART THE CLOROX
Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 117];
AND
15 (2) GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT
AVICENNA NUTRACEUTICAL’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 120.]
20 Pending before this Court are Defendants The Clorox Company, Nutranext, and Neocell Holding Company’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 117] and Defendant Avicenna Nutraceutical LLC’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. 120]. The Court decides the matters without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART both motions [Docs. 117, 120]. Further, good cause showing, the Court…