Kamal
Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YOUSSIF KAMAL, GILLIAN NEELY, Case No.: 18-CV-1298 TWR (AGS)
RICHARD LICHTEN, SUSAN COX,
NICK TOVAR, MICHELE KINMAN, ORDER: (1) DENYING
ASHLEY PETEFISH, and TERRI PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR BROWN, on their own behalf and on VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 behalf of all others similarly situated, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS Plaintiffs,
TO CHOOSE WHETHER TO
16 v. CONTINUE LITIGATING THIS ACTION OR DISMISS THEIR EDEN CREAMERY, LLC, dba HALO
INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITH
TOP CREAMERY; and JUSTIN T.
PREJUDICE
WOOLVERTON,
19 Defendants. (ECF No. 116)
21 Presently before the Court is the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (“Motion for Voluntary Dismissal,” ECF No. 116), filed by Plaintiffs Youssif Kamal, Gillian Neely, Richard Lichten, Susan Cox, Nick Tovar, Michele Kinman, Ashley Petefish, and Terri Brown. Having carefully considered the Motion for Voluntary…