Cota

Cota v. Porven, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20213:20-cv-01806California5,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULISSA COTA, individually and on Case No. 20-cv-01806-BAS-RBB behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, DISMISS COUNT II OF PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 7) PORVEN, LTD., d/b/a/ PORCELANOSA

USA,

15 Defendant. 16 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Plaintiff’s state-law claim (Count II). (Mot., ECF No. 7; Mem., ECF No. 7-1.) Plaintiff opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 10) and Defendant replies (Reply, ECF No. 11). The Court finds the Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. LR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons explained below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff Julissa Cota, a California citizen, is a visually-impaired and legally blind person who requires screen-reading software in order to access website content using her

1 These facts are all taken from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.