Maharaj
Maharaj v. Charter Communications, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVANAN MAHARAJ, Case No. 20-cv-00064-BAS-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REMAND
PROCEEDINGS TO STATE COURT
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
Defendant. (ECF No. 56) 16 Defendant Charter Communications, Inc. removed this case from San Diego County Superior Court on January 28, 2020, asserting federal jurisdiction exists under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), U.S.C. § 1332(d) (“Notice of Removal”). (ECF No. 1, Notice.) Plaintiff filed a motion to remand, arguing Defendant’s Notice of Removal fails to show that CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement has been satisfied (“Motion to Remand”). (ECF No. 56, Mot.; ECF No. 56–1, Mem.) Defendant opposes (ECF No. 57, Opp’n) and Plaintiff replies (ECF No. 60, Reply). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R.…