Reynolds

Reynolds v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:21-cv-00955California10,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAISANI REYNOLDS, Case No. 3:21-cv-00955-BAS-RBB

CDCR #AN-9755,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

RAYMOND MADDEN, et al., (ECF No. 2); Defendants. 16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO

18 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); AND

20 (3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF 60 DAYS LEAVE TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT

22 23 Plaintiff Haisani Reynolds, incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”), and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Compl.”). (ECF No. 1.) Reynolds claims that nearly three dozen CEN correctional and inmate appeals officials violated his First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights after he refused to “strip out” while a cell search was conducted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.