Felix
Felix v. City of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 JONATHAN FELIX, Case No.: 3:19-CV-0891 W (MSB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
SUMMARY-JUDGMENT MOTION
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [DOC. 49] Defendants. 18 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and partial summary judgment. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion [Doc. 49]. // // // 27 28 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND In the context of a summary-judgment motion, “courts are required to view the facts and draw reasonable inferences ‘in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.’” Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378 (2007) (quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)). “In qualified immunity cases, this usually means adopting… the…