Kelly

Kelly v. Hickman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20213:21-cv-01226California2,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GREGORY KELLY, Case No.: 21cv1226-BEN-MDD

Plaintiff/Judgment

REPORT AND

Creditor, v. RECOMMENDATION ON

MOTION FOR ASSIGNMENT

RANDALL MARK HICKMAN, ORDER AND FOR ORDER

Defendant/Judgment RESTRAINING JUDGMENT

DEBTOR

Debtor.

16 [ECF No. 4] 17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Roger T. Benitez pursuant to Local Civil Rule 69.1(e) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Civ. L.R. 69.1(e) (stating that all motions concerning execution of a judgment, except motions for Judgment Debtor examinations, “must be made to the assigned district judge, unless the motion relates to the post-judgment discovery”). Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Gregory Kelly’s (“Plaintiff”) moves the Court to enforce a 2017 judgment through an assignment of rights and for an order restraining Defendant/Judgment Debtor Randall Mark Hickman 2021…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.