Schooler

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schooler

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20213:12-cv-02164California2,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:12-cv-2164-GPC-JMA

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) RECEIVER’S FINAL FEE

APPLICATION;

LOUIS V. SCHOOLER and FIRST [ECF No. 1811]

FINANCIAL PLANNING

CORPORATION dba Western Financial (2) ALLEN MATKINS’ FINAL FEE Planning Corporation, APPLICATION; AND Defendant. [ECF No. 1812]

(3) DUFFY KRUSPODIN, LLP’S

FINAL FEE APPLICATION

20 [ECF No. 1813] 21 Before the Court are fee applications filed by the court-appointed receiver Thomas C. Hebrank (the “Receiver”), counsel to the Receiver, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (“Allen Matkins”), and tax accountant to Receiver, Duffy, Kruspodin, LLP. ECF Nos. 1811, 1812, 1813. No oppositions have been filed. The Court finds these motions suitable for disposition without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 (d)(1) and VACATES the hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.